Signage Non-Compliant - Not Prominent
For a parking charge to be enforceable, signage must be sufficiently prominent to bring the terms to the attention of a reasonable motorist entering the land. Signs that are obscured, too small, poorly positioned, or insufficient in number fail this test.
Legal basis
POFA 2012 Schedule 4, Paragraph 2(3) - 'adequate notice' must be given by display of signs 'adequate to bring the charge to the notice of drivers who park vehicles on the relevant land'. Also ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 at para 99.
How to identify this in your case
Photograph all signage at the site. Note: number of signs, size, positioning, visibility from driver's eye level, whether obscured by vegetation/other vehicles, lighting at night, distance from entrance.
Sample appeal wording
Sample wording to adapt and send yourself — it may not fit your notice or the stage you are at. Replace the bracketed prompts with your own details; leave any case citation as it is.
The signage at [LOCATION] was wholly inadequate to constitute 'adequate notice' under POFA 2012 Schedule 4. I have photographic evidence showing [SPECIFIC ISSUES]. The Supreme Court in ParkingEye v Beavis confirmed that reasonable notice of charges is essential for enforceability. In this case, the operator has failed to give adequate notice, and accordingly no binding contract was formed regarding the parking charge.
Beat It writes this argument automatically
Scan your PCN — our AI checks if this ground applies to your specific ticket, drafts a properly-cited appeal letter, and sends it for you where the council takes email — guiding you through their own online form where they use one, so you press submit. The win fee is only charged if you win.
Scan my ticketSources
- https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/schedule/4
- ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67